If you like the GMO TRUTH podcast, please rate it in ITunes if you prefer to listen there, and/or rate it here by clicking on the star ratings right here on this page. Thank you for your support!
If you have any questions or comments about this ‘cast, feel free to use the “Send a Voice Message” widget on the right, where you can make an appearance on the next GMO Truth Podcast. Or, simply comment below or send an email to email@example.com.
LINKS REFERENCED IN THIS PODCAST
Prequel Podcast — Watch this first if possible
Eric on The Chalene Show
Roundup Products Liability Litigation
Judge Threatens to Sanction Monsanto in Roundup Trial
EPA 1991 Glyphosate Peer Review
EPA Risk Assessment for Carcinogenic Effects
EPA Shoots Down Monsanto’s “Historical Data Proof” on Mouse Study
IARC Monograph on Glyphosate
The Rise of Glyphosate
GMO TRUTH #11 HIGHLIGHTS
0:44 — Check out Eric’s interview on The Chalene Show!
1:40 — Please Subscribe, Rate, Review!
2:25 — Podcast #11 is the sequel to #7 – Glyphosate Cancer Studies: Monsanto and the EPA
2:40 — A Walk a Mile Project Exclusive, get yer popcorn ready! These next FOUR podcasts are all going to be BIG!
2:55 — Two years in the making, but glyphosate now takes center stage again for two more podcasts
3:50 — Party like it’s 1991… EPA’s Glyphosate Peer Review
4:10 — Jean Parker gives The Walk a Mile Project an exclusive statement on her non-concur
9:10 — Take a deep breath and prepare for the rest of the story…
9:30 — Two different takes from two different EPA employees, Penny Fenner-Crisp interview up next
10:55 — Penny Fenner-Crisp phone interview begins
12:00 — Penny discusses the EPA’s change from a “C” to an “E”
12:58 –“Not statistically significant” tumors
15:00 — Back to the mouse study briefly
15:40 — Penny looks at the rat study data, the tumors “weren’t treatment related”
17:55 — Pairwise comparisons
20:11 — Jean vs. Penny, “there are and have been minor to major philosophical differences across programs in the agency (the EPA)”
21:54 — Data aside, was there outside pressure for a Group E classification?
22:55 — A short detour to adenomas vs carcinomas
24:55 — Back to the outside pressure question…
25:49 — Did Monsanto ever make an appearance?
26:20 — Registrants (Monsanto, etc.) would go to the department head if they didn’t like results, not other employees
27:12 — “We would’ve concluded that we didn’t have all the information we would like to have before a regulatory decision was made, but it was made anyway.”
28:07 — Another short detour, Penny’s work at WHO and FAO
29:25 — The ubiquity of glyphosate
30:20 — Penny is quietly surprised by glyphosate’s volume, “probably because… of all the GMOs… the Roundup.”
31:25 — The meteoric rise of glyphosate wasn’t even on the EPAs radar back in 1991.
32:08 — “We were only thinking about it in terms of the old-fashioned, conventional uses.”
32:48 — How the EPA’s Registration Renewal works
35:10 — Does Penny think the EPA made the right decision in 1991, based on the key assumption Jean Parker also mentioned (that the data was presented accurately for this review)?
37:15 — Wrapping up, preparing for the GMO TRUTH that will drop in GMO TRUTH Podcast Episode #12, less than a week away…
PLEASE NOTE: This is an HD Video Podcast, so the file is BIG! If you are having issues streaming the video, please right-click the SAVE VIDEO AS link, save the file to your computer, and then you can easily watch the podcast in its entirety once the download is complete.
If you only want an audio feed, please download the file noted in the “Podcast (gmo-truth-radio)” section below, and also available on iTunes as GMO TRUTH Radio. It will save you lots of disk space and time!